Comparison of the results of this test and literature  
In order to study seismic performance of this new type composite wall, the test results are analyzed and compared with the composite wall in with cladding board on both sides.
Literature , see results in Table5. Composite wall, with cladding board on two sides, has relatively poor performance due to plate stitching and large amount ofself-tapping screws.
New type of composite wall, proposed in this paper, improves overall performance by using spraying materials instead of stitching cladding boards. It changes the intermittent screw connection of hanging boards at both sides composite wall to continuous connection between materials and steel frame. This enables that new type composite wall has much superior lateral performance than composite wall with cladding system.
From the results in the table,the unit yield load of the new type composite wall increases by 48.0%～96.6% and unit max load increases by 40.1%～106.0%, lateral stiffness increases by 89.9%～117.3% compared with the testing wall in literature ,
Lateral stiffness increases by 13.5%～58.4% compared with the testing wall in literature .
Yield lateral displacement angle of new type composite wall is smaller than composite wall with cladding system, the maximum lateral displacement angle is almost equal with that in literature .
It indicates that new type wall has less deformation within elastic range and greater deformation capacity in elastic-plastic stage, which enables an excellent ductility.
It meets seismic requirement that ‘Buildings will not damage in small scale earthquake’ and ‘buildings will not collapse in large scale earthquake’.